CasinoClubben's own Telegram conversation with @StakeprixAffs documents a prolonged dispute over affiliate payments, repeated promised payment dates and no final payment receipt before the conversation ends on 6 August 2026. Public complaint records add a separate unresolved affiliate-payment complaint.
Affiliate account figures
The StakePrix affiliate dashboard screenshot reviewed by CasinoClubben on 11 August 2026 shows the following account totals.
19 referred users · €6,196.95 total wagered · €0.00 current-month commission
Payment status since June. The Telegram conversation records €90 as paid, while the dashboard shows €989.64 still pending after payment had been awaited since 8 June 2026. The dashboard's €1,076.03 total minus €989.64 pending equals €86.39, which is €3.61 less than the €90 payment stated in the conversation. The screenshot does not explain that difference, so both figures are reported separately.
This warning concerns CasinoClubben's experience with its own affiliate account on StakePrix and the payment handling associated with that account. It is not a finding that player withdrawals are unpaid, and it does not prove that every complaint against the program is correct.
What the Telegram conversation documents
CasinoClubben later identified this as the date from which payment had been awaited.
The Telegram account "Stakeprix Affiliates - E" raised a fraud review involving shared IP and browser signatures, connected accounts and deposits made from the same source.
StakePrix said its team was reviewing the traffic and repeatedly said a solution or further update would follow. The parties disagreed over whether the activity amounted to self-affiliation.
CasinoClubben repeatedly requested an update. On 14 July, StakePrix said approved FTDs would be paid by the end of that week as goodwill.
StakePrix first said payment should arrive on 20 July, then moved the matter to an account-by-account call. On 22 July it said the larger payment was goodwill and could be sent by 3 August. On 23 July it said everything was sorted.
StakePrix confirmed 3 August as the payment date and said CasinoClubben was free to send traffic. On 3 August it cited a payment-processor change and added up to 24 hours; on 4 August it still said payment was expected that day.
After CasinoClubben requested a TXID, StakePrix cited processor issues and moved payment to Friday or Monday, describing it as 100% certain. On 6 August it repeated Friday or Monday.
The conversation ends on 6 August 2026. It contains no TXID, payment receipt or message confirming that the remaining payment was completed.
Both parties' positions
Suspected self-affiliation and abusive traffic
StakePrix alleged that several referred accounts shared the affiliate's IP or browser signature and that some deposits came from the same source. It argued this looked like self-affiliation or CPA abuse and said such traffic would normally justify termination.
StakePrix said the smaller €90 payment had been approved before the fraud hold. It said approved or "real" FTDs would be reviewed account by account and paid as goodwill, later stating that the traffic issue was sorted. It then attributed further delay to a payment-processor change.
Known individuals and prior permission
CasinoClubben said the named accounts belonged to different people known in real life who had used the same computer. CasinoClubben offered to locate and contact the referred users so they could complete KYC, arguing that verified identities could potentially rebut the fraud or self-affiliation accusations. It also said an earlier StakePrix contact had permitted this setup.
CasinoClubben acknowledged helping some referred users make crypto deposits, denied owning or registering their accounts and characterised the later checks as reasons used to delay payment. CasinoClubben questioned why the €90 payment cleared while the larger batch was stopped, repeatedly requested a TXID and said new StakePrix traffic would be paused until payment. The claimed permission screenshot was not present in the Telegram conversation material reviewed for this page.
Telegram account used in the conversation
CasinoClubben retrieved the conversation directly from its own Telegram account. All documented communication covered by this report took place with @StakeprixAffs, whose display name in the conversation was "Stakeprix Affiliates - E".
Public context and evidence limits
AskGamblers' public Stake Prix Affiliates profile listed three complaints when checked on 10 August 2026: two resolved and one unresolved. The same profile listed the affiliate program's payment date as the 20th. The unresolved complaint separately alleges months of delayed affiliate payments.
These public complaints are reports by third parties, not court or regulatory findings. Two complaints were ultimately marked resolved, which is important context. The remaining unresolved complaint does not independently prove CasinoClubben's separate dispute.
This page is based on the Telegram conversation CasinoClubben retrieved directly from its own Telegram account with @StakeprixAffs, together with the linked public complaint pages. All communication covered by this report took place with @StakeprixAffs, and the conversation includes messages through 6 August 2026. CasinoClubben has not obtained the underlying Telegram platform metadata or independently verified who controlled @StakeprixAffs. StakePrix has not provided a separate response prepared specifically for this publication. A crypto payment address in the conversation was intentionally omitted.
Right of reply and corrections
StakePrix is invited to provide payment receipts, the applicable affiliate terms, traffic-review records or other evidence. Verifiable corrections and a documented settlement will be reflected on this page.
Affiliates with relevant first-hand records may also contact CasinoClubben. Do not send passwords, identity documents or unredacted payment information.
Contact @CasinoClubben